One primary point of the Full Funding Policy is that usable end items must be contracted for.

• A. Usable end items must be contracted for
• B. End items can be funded before contracts are in place
• C. The government can fund more than contractor can deliver in 12 months
• D. Funding should be distributed evenly across fiscal years

Answer: (A)

Full funding means funds are tied to a specific, usable deliverable and are obligated only when there is a contract for that deliverable. In practice, that means you don’t fund work that won’t result in a usable end item yet; you fund and contract for the completed item that can be turned over to the user. This keeps budget authority aligned with actual deliverables and accountability, preventing payment for mere development work or partial assemblies that don’t produce a usable item.

So, the emphasis is on having a contract in place for a usable end item before the corresponding funds are obligated. That’s why the statement that usable end items must be contracted for is the defining point of the policy.

Funding before a contract would undermine this by paying for work without a guaranteed end product. Funding more than can be delivered in a 12-month window or distributing funding evenly across years are budgeting considerations, but they don’t capture the core intent of ensuring the end item is a contracted, usable product before funds are committed.